Press Freedom and Journalist Protection
HRPF documented journalist-safety concerns, raised cases with relevant institutions and published research defending freedom of expression and public-interest reporting.
In pictures
About this project
HRPF documented journalist-safety concerns, raised cases with relevant institutions and published research defending freedom of expression and public-interest reporting.
The challenge
Reports of threats, violence and legal pressure on journalists raised concerns about safety and access to independent information.
Our approach
HRPF combined public statements, institutional representations and press-freedom analysis to call for impartial investigations and protection of journalists.
What we aim to achieve
- Promote journalist safety and freedom of expression.
What we do
- Documented reported threats and attacks.
- Raised concerns with relevant authorities and human-rights organisations.
- Published press-freedom analysis and recommendations.
- Issued public representations concerning reported legal pressure on journalists and requested impartial review.
Results and lasting change
- Journalist-safety concerns were communicated through public and institutional channels.
- The available records do not establish final outcomes for all individual cases.
Protection for public-interest reporting
HRPF’s public statements call for protection of journalists and impartial consideration of concerns about cases brought against media workers. The supplied newspaper coverage supports the advocacy context. Statements about alleged misuse of legal proceedings are presented as concerns raised by HRPF, rather than final judicial findings.